can’t say I’ve had issues with USB and Ethernet for that matter either
For me, it triggered the XMOS fast bitrate-change bug in my Liberty DAC, when I was using the USB to talk to the DAC along with the Ethernet to talk to the network. I switched to using the WiFi instead for the network, and the issue went away. I was curious enough to look at the source for the Pi drivers, and comments in there (and in the issue tracker) suggest that there may be packet loss when using both USB and Ethernet simultaneously, on the Pi3 B+ board. No problem for Ethernet, of course, but I don’t know enough about the USB Audio protocol to know if that’s true there as well.
yes it is. USB audio protocol (UAC) is just a layer on top of it.
But that’s not the only problem: with the 3B+ there as this ‘fake’ gigabit connection which has problems of it’s own: it results in less bandwidth than running it on 100MB. That’s why RoPieee never uses 1GB connections on a 3B+.
This is all gone with the Pi 4. The first tests already show that the GB network speed is not only theoretical, so this is a huge improvement.
I really don’t care about raw performance (because there is) because that’s not needed at all for our purpose, but this network limitation being a thing from the past … I’m happy
Something to watch out for:
I’m pretty interested in this but one thing that is concerning me slightly is that it does appear to run a fair bit hotter than the 3+, e.g. from benchmark data on the DietPi site (https://dietpi.com/survey/#benchmark) we have…
Idle Temps (average/lowest/highest) - 46/22/68 for Pi 3/3+ vs 50/37/65 for Pi 4
Full Load Temps (average/lowest/highest) - 58/28/75 for Pi 3/3+ vs 57/43/69 for Pi 4
I suppose full load isn’t much of an issue, and for a lot of the above it’s maybe 3 or 4C difference, but the lowest idle temp of 37C for the Pi 4 vs 22C for the Pi 3/3+ makes me slightly concerned for those of us (including me) who have their Pi shut inside a media cabinet and how that 15C difference for the coolest it ever gets (according to those benchmarks) might affect stability.
Hopefully I’m seeing potential problems where none actually exist.
Agree…I’m in the topics and ambient temps are in the 30’s most of the time unless the ac is on. I’m not having issues with lan based connections and even can push dsd512 to Usb dacs so I’ll be sitting on the 3b for a long while…not even the 3b+ even though I have a couple of them.
any chance to have multichannel?
Good question Niccolo!
Hans Beekhuyzen has recently posted a sensible explanation for why RPi4 may not be a great choice for audio despite USB 3 and a separate network interface: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjqEPyMr1zI&t=300s
Sensible? I’m afraid I don’t see it that way.
He basically says he tried a couple of Allo hats on them and didn’t like the RPi4 sound as much as the 3B+. But since I don’t have his ears or perception biases, I don’t know what that means. Could be that I’d hear it the same way, as I presume the Allo hats were designed for the 3B+. But I don’t know. He also says (and I have to admit I snorted at this, given the measurement props in the backgrounds of his videos) that he had no way of measuring it.
I wouldn’t be using the Allo hats in any case, because I’d be using the USB output, which he doesn’t actually test. He seems to have some aversion to using the USB output, which is what I’d use with a Pi4, because that’s what the change from the 3B+ to the 4 fixes. He does refer to the USB output as being “polluted”, but offers no measurements to justify that sort of drive-by inanimadversion.
As a general aside: I haven’t watched a lot of his videos, because they seem to me to be flat, lifeless, and content-free. But that’s just the way I perceive them, so, as always, YMMV.
I just watched this again, to see if I was missing something. Instead, I noticed another digression. In the section on “Bandwidth”, he first introduces the idea that “top designers” of high-end streamers often feel that USB2 is better than USB3 for their products. He then says that’s easy to understand, and first explains that USB2 has enough bandwidth to handle audio. But then, instead of explaining why it’s better than USB3, he takes a left turn onto talking about Ethernet! He never does explain why it’s easy to understand, or explain the reason for the claimed preference.
So, has anybody tried the RPi4 USB out to a DAC with feeding the stream via Ethernet? Is there an observable difference with the RPi3B+? Is there a difference when 3B+'s Ethernet set to 100Mbps?
Agreed - I’d be interested in seeing a proper comparison between an unadorned RPi4, an Allo USBridge and a microRendu as an ethernet to USB converter (using Roon Bridge, naturally)…
I should really get one and try that, but my 3B+ with WiFi in and USB out works fine. As long as I avoid shuffle play, which is prone to tickling the other darn bug.
What is that other bug?
We shipped a workaround for the XMOS bug in 1.6 back in January.
I missed that. I’ll try my problematic playlist again.
I’ve been using RoPiee on a RPi3B+ with the USB port connected to a PS Audio Sprout (wired
ethernet). It works well most of the time. But when playing high res files and specially DSD I sometimes get intermittent pops in the audio.
When I switched over to a RPi4 (1GB) I didn’t hear any pops on the high res music. But I only tested the RPi4 for 2 days, as I ran into other issues.
But, the two pi’s sounded that same (not counting the pops).
Does anyone here have a technical understanding of whether the 4gb model would bring any added value? Or would the 1gb be sufficient - given that the Pi3 runs Ropieee just fine with 1gb, my guess is that’s all you need in the Pi4.