You can access the Logs of the RoonServer on your “RoonServer” share, that you created according to the installation instructions.
In that shared folder you can find the logs in the directory RoonServer/Logs
If @support asks you for these files, they will tell you how to provide them.
Has RoonServer worked before and this issue just occurred now?
I just received the QNAP TVS-882 last week and finished the setup over the weekend and never seemed to be stable. Prior to the QNAP I had RoonServer running a ReadyNAS-516 NAS/Linux and never had an issue.
Have several other apps installed on the QNAP and they run without issue.
Your QNAP environment looks fine so far. But RoonServer outputs Socket errors:
System.Net.Sockets.SocketException (0x80004005): Connection reset by peer
at System.Net.Sockets.Socket.EndReceive (System.IAsyncResult result) [0x00033] in <bd46d4d4f7964dfa9beea098499ab597>:0
at Sooloos.RnetJsonClient+<_BeginRead>c__AnonStorey5.<>m__0 (System.IAsyncResult ar) [0x00037] in /home/roon/roon/RoonBase/rnet_json_client.cs:335
System.Net.Sockets.SocketException (0x80004005): Connection reset by peer
at System.Net.Sockets.Socket.EndReceive (System.IAsyncResult result) [0x00033] in <bd46d4d4f7964dfa9beea098499ab597>:0
at Sooloos.RnetJsonClient+<_BeginRead>c__AnonStorey5.<>m__0 (System.IAsyncResult ar) [0x00037] in /home/roon/roon/RoonBase/rnet_json_client.cs:335
I think it would be best if @support could take a look.
Could this be a network config issue? I enabled port trunking on the QNAP and LACP on my Cisco switch. I am going to disable and run a single interface to the switch - disable all port trunking and bonding.
Hmmm, I used LACP (802.3ad) here a while ago, too. Had no issues with it. But I am unsure if that was on Synology or QNAP. I will try it again on the qnap. I used it in combination with a Cisco SG300 switch.
But it certainly does not hurt if you try a single connection. It is always good to slim down the complexity of a network setup in case of issues.
If your issue is indeed network related (I don’t know that), it might also be interesting to change (temporarily) the managed switch for an unmanaged one (if possible and one is available).