Folks,
Need some thoughts & advise.
I picked some tracks from diff CD and converted them to .WAV raw fully lossless & I imported it to Roon and played it.
I also played corresponding versions from Tidal / Qobuz 16/44 from Roon.
Every time I saw the the .WAV version from CD outperformed in sound quality compared to the streamed version.
The .wav file always was better in
sound quality
separation of instruments
bass
treble
dynamics
sound volume level or gain
The equipment setup is the same in both cases and I have a gigabit 1Gbps internet connection speed.
Have other folks experienced and seen this behaviour?
I would appreciate thoughts & comments on this.
People will suggest these are mastering differences, but in case you don’t believe all the different CD you have come from different masters as Tidal / Qobuz and you are willing to do some experiments:
Try compressing the WAV to FLAC with maximum compression (since both Tidal and Qobuz stream FLAC). Play the FLAC and see if you notice any difference - normally people do not expect any difference since the bits (after decompression) are still the same. This removes one of the several differences in your playback chain.
Thanks Peter, interesting are you saying the playback difference can be due to WAV vs FLAC
although both are lossless WAV sounds better than FLAC?
I will try to convert my CD files to FLAC and see if the audio quality matches up.
And yes the songs I selected were from different sources and not from same the album or same master.
The file itself cannot sound different, but in some setup more processing in a computer can result in degradation of the SQ of a directly connected USB DAC.
I try to approach this from a point of eliminating different factors. The differences at least are: possible mastering differences, decompression processing, modem, and local source machine (e.g. NAS), etc.