Settle down. You greatly misread my post.
Did I ever criticize you personally? I levied a shot at what is yet another needlessly adulterated high resolution remaster that deviates from a long established consensus dynamic envelope for this album.
I suggested that you play your CD-3240 rip simply to demonstrate that it likely matches the other CD-3240 masterings in the Dynamic Range DB and probably requires close to my prediction of around -5 dB Volume leveling to get to -18 LUFS, meaning that it has about 4-6 dB more dynamic range than the remaster.
Who are you, by the way? You do not sound like you just joined in April. You sound like a disgruntled user who closed a previous account and now has returned for more.
AJ