@CrystalGipsy -I’m going to be asking the tech team about your traces at our next meeting, but can you let me know if the behavior is the same if you perform the search for Julian Cope a second time? Is there any change in then?
@PixelPopper - Can you please open a separate thread? Here I can see that the backend search took a bit of time in @CrystalGipsy’s logs but you might be experiencing something else if the average is around 45ms for you.
Can you please provide some examples of terms you are searching for? Are these artists/tracks part of your current library? Does the same search behavior occur if you search for the artists again immediately afterwards?
Searching for artists in and not in my library had same results. I was just artist searching for the most , when I found it was slow I did some common ones such as the Beatles, the rolling stones pretty much anything has was slow with the Beatles being probably the slowest and I have a lot of their albums in my collection. When they did come up album population was also slow. It’s sped up a bit this evening but still way slower than it should be.
Hi @noris
I just did some random searches on artists both in my collection and not, just to check if there was any improvement.
I have just done a random search on “black sabbath” which again took 10-15 seconds to offer any results. I do have some of the material in my local collection.
I got home this evening it was really quick. Now it’s stuck for over a minute trying to find Let Eat Grandma, I have both their albums in my local collection.