Not trying to start a war here, but I got myself some Wireworld Starlight Ethernet cable, and I like the results compared to the generic Cat6 I had. My perception is that improves the detail and the resolution on my setup (headphones).
YMMV
Most of WW dealers allow for in home trial, so no risk for you guys to try. If it does not work / improve things on your setup, return it. You’re out only the shipping. PM me for a good WW dealer that gives a very nice discount.
I am now looking at ethernet switches that are discussed extensively over the CA forums.
Again, just my opinion. Please no judging. We all “vote” with our money.
I found this useful. Covers ground loops, antenna effect, cable termination, and baked potato effect (I had never heard of this one).
I’ve been using Cat 6A S/STP I got for around $5-10. Each one came with it’s own measurements. I haven’t noticed any problems in comparison to Cat 5e and Cat 6 UTP I had been using previously.
A shield reduces the effects of induced
noise for signals > 30 MHz. GREATER than 30 MEGAhertz.
and
Apply 60 Hz AC current
directly onto shield of
F/UTP cable
– Not an induced current
– a placed current
• Test signal integrity on
balanced twisted-pairs
for presence of 60Hz
influence
Results
• No influence
on signal
integrity at
60Hz
You don’t really make your point by linking photos of PC boards with black boxes on them. Why don’t you instead link to a data sheet on one of the devices in question?
At least they’re visible (with visible part numbers for googling) - another alternative is the MagJack - the transformer is part of the RJ45 socket so not a visible seperate device.
The part numbers on the transformers are like 10 foot tall on the screen. So are you going to come off your claim that Ethernet isn’t transformer coupled?
The not lazy would simply go to www.google.com/images and input 'Ethernet Magnetics" if they wanted to see all these switches with them. I’ll stop spoon feeding you now.
I took a closer look at my switch, three routers, and BDP-1’s ethernet jacks. Only the BDP-1 and one of the older routers had ethernet jacks with the metal casing around the connector.
I guess I’m asking more from a theoretical standpoint. Is there a theoretical advantage, disadvantage, or no difference when using S/STP with plastic vs. metal jacks?
The only other person I’ve seen here mentioned the use of S/STP is @joel. Any thoughts on why you picked S/STP?
Yes, the jacks on all my S/STP cable are all metal. All the other Cat 5e and 6 cables I have are plastic. I didn’t find much info or discussion on the female receptor jacks on switches and routers and whether they are shielded or not. Some have metal casing around the female port, others have plastic. Maybe I’m being dense and not grasping it.
Anyways, I did briefly compare my S/STP 6a against the 5e I had been using previously. This is for the whole chain wherever ethernet is used and not just the last link. I had been using the SSTP for a month exclusively.
Based on the sighted and brief listening tests, I’ll be sticking with S/STP with the combination of components I have so far. It’s the same thing I heard (or rather not heard) when I got them first after having been using UTP for the entire duration.
If you have those side tabs then you have a switch router that is going to make the connection and maintain continuity with the metal plated 8P8C connectors.
Thank you! That’s what I needed to know. I took a look at my BDP-1 and it does have the tabs. The spare router and switch I had been using for the closed system in the audio room didn’t have the tabs. I have another older Trendnet router that does have the metal tabs. I will give that a try as well.
I find it strange that between all the discussion of various Cat ‘X’ cables and shielding or unshielded, there’s rarely any discussion or concern whether the devices themselves support the shielding or not.