Another against is you can’t make them headless without an adaptor I think as the GPU is inactive without a connection but it’s not expensive. So not a major deterrent.
$599 is not a huge risk, why not give it a go? Make sure you run Roon Server if a GUI isn’t required, disable Spotlight, App Store automatic updates, etc, and enable file sharing for copying music over.
One more disadvantage. You can’t upgrade it once bought. So if you do require more ram due to library bloat then you might run aground. Nuc you can easily upgrade. So if getting a Mac mini I would spend more and get more ram as Roons a memory hog.
I’m waiting to see some Roon with 8GB/16GB comparisons, the Mini’s SSD is blazingly fast, page swaps are instant, many reviews say 8GB is fine (but they don’t test Roon)
With ROCK/Roon OS you’ve got a device running an OS that you effectively never need to login in to update, it just looks after itself like an appliance. If you need to reboot it you can do that via the RoonOS web interface.
With a MacMini (assuming you don’t have or want a monitor and keyboard attached permanently) you’ll need a way to remotely login to it to periodically approve OSX updates and possibly deal with general OSX notifications and pop-ups from time to time. Not a major dealbreaker, but something worth considering.
Also no need for a brand new NUC, an older used model will be fine, especially if you’re planning to hide it away in another room or closet.
Conversely I guess a MacMini is better (visually) if you’re planning to attach it directly to your amp or DAC via USB and hence have it on permanently display.
2 Likes
Bill_Janssen
(Wigwam wool socks now on asymmetrical isolation feet!)
13
It seems to me tha the Mac world has better hardware maintenance options than the NUC/Linux world. If your server breaks, you can take it to the Apple store for repair.
Experience building Rock on NUC is invaluable. Adding memory and expanding storage, and troubleshooting are all within reach. However, Macs may require Apple intervention.
Bill_Janssen
(Wigwam wool socks now on asymmetrical isolation feet!)
19
Personally, I would never buy a Mac to run Roon. For two reasons.
One is that Apple has gotten more and more averse to anything not invented by Apple, and they are making it harder and harder to run third-party software that they haven’t “blessed”. In the name of security and privacy, and they have a point, but it’s gone too far for my taste.
The other is that Roon is built on top of .NET, a Windows platform that Microsoft tries very hard to make work on macOS – but Apple doesn’t always seem to be cooperating with with Microsoft’s efforts.
I think I remember screen sharing came out around 2008, I’m using it since then without a problem
I bought m1 mini for audio and because I’m 97% on apple comps for years. After 2 moths I found about roon and had the trial. the mini works as a roon core. I do not mind small bugs. On the other hand ROCK is made for Roon so if it can be simpler why not. Now I’m just waiting for the mini to die or to find another use for it
2 Likes
Bill_Janssen
(Wigwam wool socks now on asymmetrical isolation feet!)
21
I started with Roon on a Mac Mini and was very happy. But I was running Linux on it, not macOS. The hardware is nifty; it’s just the Apple policies that have started to get in the way.
This is definitely becoming more true with Ventura. An example of this and an explanation most can understand has been well presented by the developer of A better finder rename.