Anders, that is an effective argument for ripping physical media, then stashing away out of sight. But that is not an effective argument for employing no data compression.
AJ
Anders, that is an effective argument for ripping physical media, then stashing away out of sight. But that is not an effective argument for employing no data compression.
AJ
I think it is.
By compressing, you might save a cent per CD. If you have 2000 CDs (which cost $10,000 - $50,000 to buy), you would save $20. What is the risk of compatibility problems? One in a thousand? One in a million? Would you take a one in a million risk in order to save $20?
You overlook numerous other relevant factors. In transferring files from one disk to another or over a network, for example, are your time and network bandwidth also “free”?
AJ
I think you overlook another relevant factor: is the mental energy spent on optimizing tiny costs free?
The brain power of all the people reading and pondering this?
I have around 3,000 albums - none of them with their original album title - which I always use in preference to the Roon titles (I let Roon sort out most of the other metadata) and have only rarely had problems with Roon recognition - and I cannot attribute this to the fact that I rename album title (usually older CDs that I have ripped that do not exactly match the contents of later reissues in the fully digital era). If I left album title to Roon, I would be totally lost! As hundreds of posts on this site suggest, classical music metadata is a law unto itself.
I suppose I did the same thing in the software now I think about it in my previous system, I had
[album] - [artist] as the display name but constructed as a string by the software
Starting with Roon I left them as the bare Album Name
Recognition in classical stuff is still poor, out of 3000 ish I still have 300 in id’ed
You are right Classical metadata is a nightmare, I am still toying with JRiver for classical, Roon for Rock as I can control what I see and how I navigate
Do a google search on FLAC compression level. You’ll see there’s little difference in file size from 3 to 8. 3 seems to be the sweet spot.
I wanted to thank everyone for the input here. Lots of good information and food for thought. I settled on DBpoweramp defaults for compression and it’s working great. I also went with the defaults for file naming and results have been superb.