I would like to know whats roon perfer usb out to dac or through lan to streamer and than to dac. I use nuc12 i7, my dac n streamer both r roon ready. Streamer is chord 2go2yu, Dac is nagra tube dac. I hear usb out can perform better than through ethernet to streamer. May I know is that right?
Roon Core Platform
Roon Optimized Core Kit (ROCK)
Roon Core Specifications
Intel nuc1260p 32G 3200ddr4, m.2 nvme pcie4 4t n fanless case
Connected Audio Devices
Usb to nagra tube dac or Chromecast to chord 2go2yu
You will find all possible answers to this question. It depends on your system and the quality of the components and the network.
I am using a direct USB connection from my Nucleus to my DAC and this sounds very good to my ears. I tried the ethernet way, too - with a very good separate streamer in between and no USB, and I prefer the other solution. Others will advise to use a streamer and in no case a direct connection via USB. A matter of personal taste.
Hope that helps.
My understanding is that you use a streamer only if you cannot connect your DAC directly to your Core (other rooms/floors/outside/etc.). A streamer is an extension device, so to me it does not make sense to use one if direct USB connection (which is bit perfect, so there is no use in questioning whether a streamer is better) to your core is possible.
On the other hand, I finally arrived at flawless performance using: Fanless Win11 core with Roon server install >
USB >
Intona USB Isolator >
USB >
DAC
Always had more or less intermittent audible problems with different RaspberryPis as streamers, no matter what OS (Raspbian, DietPi, Ropieee), wired or WiFi, and even direct USB.
Your understanding does not agree with Roonâs recommended config which is to separate the Core and End Point across a network connection
Roon does not recommend that configuration thats all i was saying
2 Likes
Bill_Janssen
(Wigwam wool socks now on asymmetrical isolation feet!)
11
Theyâre pretty much the same. The alleged differences are mainly mythology. The exact answer depends on the streamer, and how itâs connected to the amp. Iâd just use USB if itâs convenient.
Are you sure they are not suggesting to use ethernet vs. WiFi, when you are making a network connection?
Any particular DAC might, or might not, work better with USB vs Ethernet vs two cans on a string, depending on how well each piece is implemented. Assuming semi-competent design there are no physical reasons for one to sound any different from another though.
I suspect Roonâs recommendation is as much down to lowering their support burden than anything else.
If Roon suggests users connect their USB DAC to a Nucleus and if it fails to work, then they potentially have a support query to handle (even if it eventually turns out the be the DAC thatâs at fault)
If Roon suggests users connect their USB DAC to a 3d party âRoon Readyâ streamer and if it fails to work, the 3rd party has a support query to handle (at least in the first instance).
1 Like
James_I
(The truth is out there but not necessarily here)
15
I disagreeâŚthe core->Ethernet->endpoint suggestion is a quality based concept in response to things like full memory playback where the idea is the playback device has very few processes running and thus less likely to generate interference. Believe the objective or not, but itâs not about reducing support.
The suggested configuration is perfectly logical. It just may not be needed if that interference doesnât exist in your particular stack.
Bill_Janssen
(Wigwam wool socks now on asymmetrical isolation feet!)
16
I suppose only Roon knows why the particular recommendation is the way that it is. No point in speculating as to their motives.
But in most set-ups, a direct connection via USB or S/PDIF will work equally well, quality-wise. And it eliminates the separate streamer, which is another point of possible failure.
I would think that their motivation is actually explained in âRule 4: Donât under-spec the serverâ of the article linked by (@)Marin_Weigel, where they state:
Invest in your server components just like you would in your other gear, and remember that there is no downside to a Core i7 with a fan if youâve got it located two rooms away from the listening area.
This is something you can only achieve with Ethernet, not USB.
Bill_Janssen
(Wigwam wool socks now on asymmetrical isolation feet!)
18
Sure. Donât get me wrong, I think Roonâs recommendations are quite helpful for those unwilling or unable to think for themselves. Some good basic rules. But not necessarily the be-all and end-all of audio layout design.
4 Likes
James_I
(The truth is out there but not necessarily here)
19
Câmon Bill thatâs a bit insulting. Around 10-15 years ago, reading about concepts like memory playback, disabling most of an OS to âoptimizeâ a PC for audio, and other such workarounds, I thought, what a pain in the a$$, you canât change a playlist or do anything other than listen to a static list with such configurations, why canât we have a setup where a more powerful machine transmits audio to a quieter box?
Then Roon appeared. (I donât mean like an apparition at midnight or anything, although that would be great marketing).
Now, USB has improved a whole lot since then and Iâm not saying its a requirement for good audio at this time. But I donât think itâs fair to say that considering the recommendations of a product developer means youâre not thinking for yourself.
Roon has comprehensive and robust support for WiFi, but the sound quality often isnât the same. For your highest quality rooms, plan on using wired gigabit ethernet connections between the Core and the Outputs.
This is very much about reducing support burden. Roon does not have resources to troubleshoot every questionable WiFi setup, lack of proper USB Audio drivers and all that. Ethernet connection in a usual home network configuration to a Roon Ready device will pretty much always âjust work.â
Read the forum, how many threads complain âRoon Doesnât Workâ, âRoon Skipsâ , âStuttering and Dropoutsâ and other variations on the theme .
Quite simply WiFi is (IN MOST CASES) is not up to supplying a stable network connection for Roon.
BEFORE I am shot down in the inevitable flames, many users use it and are happy with their Wi Fi implementation ,many are NOT.
Of those threads that complain most eventually comes down to a sub standard Wi Fi implementation.
To accuse Roon of recommending Ethernet to lighten the support role is simply ludicrous. They are quite simply recommending , from experience, the best quality and trouble free method of connection for their product
The Core > Ethernet > Roon Ready approach is Roonâs best weapon, the piece of kit doing the work (the End Point) is Roon Ready and has been certified to work with a RAAT stream. USB Implementation vary between hardware manufacturers and hence Roon cannot be responsible for that implementation. Roon Tested may approach the few.
You pays your money you takes your choice , but donât moan if it doesnât work 100%