For the Mac, I tapped manually, indeed, the IP address that DHCP assigned to it, and stopped DHCP to keep the IP constant.
On GentooPlayer, there’s a special feature to assign a fixed IP.
For the Log files of Roon and HQPLayer, I don’t know where to look for them on the Mac…
It does not happen often that HQPlayer eats the RAM of the computer, but when it occurs, it’s with the same settings with which it played fine before. It starts suddenly.
I run Roon Server (no UI app) and HQPlayer 5 on an M1 Mac mini (16GB/512GB) and use a Holo Audio Red as an NAA and a Holo Audio May KTE DAC.
I have not experienced any losses of connection between Roon and HQPlayer. I have had no issues with HQPlayer 5 losing connection to the NAA or the NAA connecting to the DAC.
HQPlayer 5 is using a lot memory (just under 3.5GB) but is does not appear to have a memory leak. In other words, the memory used does not just keep increasing. It is stable.
If someone can explain to me where to look for the log files, I will attach them to a post when Roon loses the connection to HQPlayer.
It happened twice earlier today, but at this moment, both work well together, and I enjoy the music with the DSD upsampling.
It is explained in the Troubleshooting-section of the manual…
But first enable log file from HQPlayer settings, then restart HQPlayer. When something happens, you can find log file from folder “~/.hqplayer” on macOS (you can get there with Go to Folder menu option of Finder), called HQPlayer5Desktop.log
Roon also had some menu option to see their log file. Maybe someone from Roon can chime in.
Hi @jussi_laako ,
HQPlayer stopped seeing NAA on GentooPlayer. NAA does not appear as crushed on GentooPlayer, but HQPlayer won’t see it unless I reboot of GentooPlayer.
This is what the Log of HQPlayer says:
NAA runs on an i3 NUC that is configured as a Diretta Host.
The sound is rendered by NAA on the Host, and then streamed with the Diretta protocol to the end-point: an Allo USBridge that also runs GentooPlayer, and is configured as a Diretta Target.
To everyone, asking about the difference I perceive between HQPe proprietary player vs. Roon … I my case they are now running on same PC (Linux Ubuntu desktop version) (same load, same track, same source (Qobuz, 24-192, various tracks), same cables, same network piers, same f****ng everything, to exactly same NAA (self-built pc with tons of capacity vs required) with attention to grounding details and noise reduction, where a Matrix Element H is mounted (galvanically isolated from MB, powered from Keces P3 linear psu, disconnected from pc smps, also feeding the RME DAC with same ground potential) putting out bit stream to same RME DAC in direct DSD mode exactly same way and same config settings irrespective of HQPe Player or Roon Player, så that HQPe re-/upsampling is streamed directly to sf steady clocked buffert and in to AKM4493EQ chip without any interference from RME onboard DSP. It cannot be more “same” to compare, and HQPe is superior to Roon. The noise is lower (I am an electrical engineer and have been working for a number of years with my own rig and now also develop filters for a hifi brand for the mains noise) thanks to a meticulously arranged grounding system for all devices, mains, digital and analogue signal paths, the dynamics consequently higher, very clearly audible transient speed improvement and phrasing. Have had a number of guests now where I switched back and forth, not telling what was playing and everyone prefered HQPe Player.
Roon is so much nicer to use, but HQPe is sonically better and by far more natural and that is what counts for me. It would be very interesting though to know what does the difference …
Again, in my experience, using Roon as the player or HQPlayer client as the player makes absolutely no difference in my setup using HQPlayer 5 Desktop and a Holo Audio Red NAA to a Holo Audio May DAC.
The Red and the May are getting the same musical data from HQPlayer 5 Desktop in both cases so how could it sound different? What is your explanation for the difference you hear? Are you suggesting that the NAA or the DAC are getting different data?
I am not suggesting anyhting. I am just experiencing that what is “played” to HQPe re-/upsampling section set on te config page from either Roon or HQPe prorieteray player clearly is audible different and in favor of HQPe player. I think there must be some difference in data sent to the NAA and forwards to the DAC as the is a difference. As the ingeneer I am, I knew I hade to cancel any differences in signal path out, i e cables network piers, pc’s, hardware in general. There could not remain anything causing indifferences in signal path, but solely the software comparison taking place in one single unit, equal to both playback systems, and all adjacent hardware/software identical i both playback cases, not to inflict any other differences.
It is spooky, but nevertheless true and no subtle almost inaudible making it possible to derive to wether you’ve had both cups of coffee that day or just one. Everyone hear it, and the one’s that have, clearly prefer HQPe player as the most natural sounding and dynamic. I have a recording with Air on the G string, where there is a cembalo in the orchestra and I know the recording very well and have followed me for years. Playing it now is probably what the medicine thought of first time x-raying tissue.
Everything’s turned off in Roon. I followed Jussis recommendation to the letter and never looked back. Roon should not do any DSP, at least when HQP is the receiver, even though its DSP functions sounds ok, if played directly to a DAC. The HQPe re-configuration is so powrful, it resembles nothing I have ever encountered except tuning power supplies.
What could the difference be? Maybe @jussi_laako can tell us. If Roon sends a song to HQPlayer or the HQPlayer client sends a song to HQPlayer, do you think one setup is sending different data to the NAA than the other?
@jussi_laako : with HQP5 and my A26, I get crack/glitch when starting DSD playback or when changing source frequency. In fact, it’s mostly with the Sinc-MGa filter (I haven’t tested with all the others).