I suggest part of the issue is that subjectivists use scientific sounding explanations without using scientific methods and it feels like a perversion to objectivist engineers.
Here was my attempt to bring the camps to the table together:
Is it possible that the 2 Pi solution is actually better than the $7500 streamer because the $7500 streamer is totally against what RAAT and the recommended Roon solution is supposed to do? In other words, if the $7500 streamer is one of those overbuilt PCs with huge configuration contortions to try to create a powerful yet electrically quiet machine (kind of an oxymoron), it may simply mean that a Pi is a better streamer in the Roon server-streamer configuration?
I have noticed that many of the folks who assert that Roon/RAAT doesn’t sound as good as another software solution on the same box have these overbuilt server/streamer combos that go against what Roon recommends (powerful server on one end, simple and quiet streamer on the other) and why Roon was designed as it was.
Just a thought. So many people like to argue over configurations without even stating what theirs is. You have to compare apples to apples, not just fruit to fruit, as it were.