Thinking outloud as a way of communicating what I did and what I got and what might be better for ripping two box sets devoted to Itzhak Perlman which I just purchased. To be clear, my post is not intended to complain. Rather to attract any suggestions for a better way of organizing my collection for two box sets devoted to the same artist, one with 25 CDs to rip and the second with 77 CDs.
The 25 CD box set arrived first; and I already ripped 13 discs. Perhaps, I am used to the synergy iTunes provided when I started ripping my music library back in 2011. I have over 6000+ albums.
What made sense to me was to differentiate the DG Complete Recordings 25 CDs as one collection and the Warner Bros 77 CDs as another collection. I choose for the DG collection as follows. Ripped each CD using the album title on the CD followed by “Disc 1 of 25” etc. For the cover art, I use the actual album cover art for each album as opposed to the generic cover art for the whole Deutsche Grammophon Collection. I prefer each album cover art to be specific as a further graphical method to easily identify (if it is easy) than 25 generic cover art identifying the actual collection in its totality. As iTunes provides a category for grouping, I entered (foolishly) Itzhak Perlman Complete Recordings on Deutsche Grammophon as another way to keep the synergy of the collection. Foolishly because, I no longer watch iTunes Music collection and the iTunes Music Library stored on an external Raid 5 Thunderbolt 12TB R6 HDD. In other words, I first rip a CD and edit the metadata in iTunes application so that when I open iTunes (for whatever reason) the organization matches how I want my library to be. As iTunes offers a grouping category, that helps keep the 25CDs in that group. And using “Disc 1 of 25” helps keep the order of the discs in the same order as the collection was presented rather than alphabetically.
However, back to foolishly, the editing for the iTunes application does not, I believe, affect the actual stored iTunes Music on my external Thunderbolt HDD unless I add all that information to the album label. But if I open iTunes, the application, that metadata is operative.
After ripping 13 discs, I opened roon and waited for the watched folder to include those new additions. roon has it’s own system and synergy. Some of my cover art was changed to the generic collection cover art which is easy to change back to the actual album cover art. Some of the album titles were changed to Complete Recordings on Deutsche Grammophon and omitting the specific title of the album. That’s also easy to correct by going into Edit Track information and deselecting roon’s choice of title and checking my own metadata. It’s extra work that I am prepared to do to get the results I want. Don’t understand how roon accepts some of my metadata as I originally created it and changes some of the discs in a seemingly random selection of change. It’s all correctable.
Any suggestions? Does including information, i.e., “Disc 1 of 25” allow for the sequencing of the album order (to conform to the actual collection’s order)? Is there any utility in also adding the grouping information, i.e., Itzhak Perlman Complete Recordings On Deutsche Grammophon Disc 1 etc.? to also organize and group those 25 CDs ripped to allow me access to that group without searching all over for each album?
I am not really proficient at metadata editing in conformance with how roon might receive my collection for a box set grouped as I would want it. And I am taking the time and space to construct this epic post before i finish ripping the remaining 12 albums of the Itzhak Perlman DG collection. And before I start on the Warner collection of 77 CDs. Yikes!
Sorry for the long post. Hope I have covered comprehensively what my outcome is for each collection, that is, group one collection all together in separate albums using the album title and not the collection title, using the individual album cover art, assembling the collection in a numerical order from disc 1 to disc 25 which makes some sense to me as it replicates the collection’s order of discs and follows the included booklet with the box set. And furthermore, helps me manage a fairly larger box set of 77 CDs that I want separate from the DG collection.
Is there a better method for editing or creating the metadata that will accomplish my outcome? Any suggestions will be appreciated. Thank you for your attention.
Best,
Richard
PS
As an example of what I refer to as cover art generic and individual