Hi,
I am currently using a trial of Roon and wondering whether it can suit my purposes.
Up until now I have been using a laptop with iTunes as my main music library, which I use on the go, with all audio files stored locally on the laptop. I also use the laptop for DJing, using Traktor, and I am able to import the iTunes library to this.
I then mirror the iTunes library to the Mac Mini using Chronosync which periodically replaces the iTunes library on the Mac Mini and also updates a hard drive connected to the Mac Mini with any new audio files or changes to existing files. So each iTunes library accesses audio files on the same local machine.
In this setup, all of the editing of tags/files, ripping of CDs, etc, happens on the laptop. I am away from home a fair bit, and I pretty much always have my laptop with me when I travel, so it makes sense to set things up in this way.
So, now I am considering Roon, I have to think about a setup that would give me similar results. I am aware that I can set up the Roon Core on the Mac Mini, and still edit everything with Roon on the laptop, but only when I am at home. I wouldn’t be able to edit things or rip CDs when I am away from home, as I can with my current setup. And I also need my audio files physically on my laptop for when I travel/DJ.
But, as I don’t want to always have my laptop on to listen to music at home, it doesn’t make sense to use the laptop as the core. Unless there is a way, similar to the way in which I used iTunes before, that I can mirror the Roon library from the laptop to the Mac mini, and each can use local files for playback?
I am aware that I can create a backup of a Roon library. Would this be a way of doing something similar to my current method? Create a backup on the laptop and then restore on the Mac Mini, and copy audio files over in the way I am already doing, with the file path on the Mac Mini matching that on the laptop (such that everything should get picked up fine by Roon on the Mac Mini)? Or is there another/better way?
And could I do all of this with one core? I assume if so, it would mean de-authorising and re-authorising each time I switch, which would be a bit of a pain, meaning that I would need two cores, which would be expensive.
I hope this makes sense, and would be glad of some advice.
Thanks,
Nick