FLAC 48kHz 24bit MQA 96kHz
FLAC 48kHz 24bit MQA192kHz
In the two examples above I understand 48kHz is what the MQA file is encapsulated in and it is 1 times the value. If it’s 48kHz you get the first unfold to 96kHz ie double the value.
If you have a MQA DAC further unfolding occurs, however, what I don’t understand is what the final values of 96/192kHz are telling us.
In the first example you could say 96kHz is double ie the first unfold so we are just being reminded of that but then this interpretation wouldn’t apply to the second example with 192kHz.
If we were being told the double unfolded value then that wouldn’t make sense with the first example where 96kHz is displayed.
Very simply can anyone explain what the final values of 96/192kHz are telling us above?
are you saying the values of 96/192 in my first example are the double unfolded final sample rates? in that case with the second example 48 to 96 to 192 is okay. but the first example 48 to 96 to 96 doesn’t work. i’m trying to understand what the final values are?
I’m not saying anything. This is what Roon shows when I play a 24/192 MQA using my Dragonfly Cobalt which is MQA capable.
They only refer to the sample rate of the master used to produce this music.
You cannot infer the final rendering rate from this and it differs among different MQA DAC. It is only guaranteed that a MQA DAC will do this in the best manner as determined by MQA Ltd.
Aha it’s starting to make sense now. I was looking at these values as having something to do with the final rendering rate. many thanks
MQA is MQA and you should listen to the analog audio. The traditional digital numbers are not relevant from a listeners perspective. That’s the old paradigm. It’s either MQA or it isn’t.