Over the past year while I have been subscribing to Roon there have been numerous appeals for improvements in the handling of Classical Music.
I am fully aware , as far as I know, of all the various ways of approaching a classical library with , Tags, Bookmarks , Composition view and the various filters etc and the Album view with Focus but in my opinion they leave the experience wanting .
The Composer view showing works as opposed to Albums is virtually useless to me as I have sets like the complete works of Beethoven and Bach 2000 so you are swamped with works. As it is I have had to change my approach of selecting music to accommodate the shortfalls as I see them. I used to go Composer>Genre>Album – Pick now I find that Artist> Album is the most reliable way . Before someone explains the various methods of navigation, I think I have tried most and I am not moaning without having exhausted most avenues. I am sure there are tricks I haven’t tried
I appreciate that development effort is limited and that decisions have to be made to improve the UI for the most users . (My money is on Remote Internet Access as the next biggy release as that seems to be having the most vocal users. ) I appreciate that Roon Management will not advise their planned developments and deadlines and I agree with the approach but we Classical Fans are seeing no hints that improvements in the user experience is in the pipeline. Is there any light at the end of the pipeline ?
Handling of Box Sets has been raised numerous times, the big record labels , Phillips, DG etc are cashing in on back catalogue with Centenaries (Bernstein & Karajan for example) and releasing mega sets . Often these sets can replace old worn out vinyl and come at ridiculously cheap prices often < $2 per CD. BUT put them in Roon and they are pretty close to unusable. Sets of 100 – 200 discs are not uncommon eg Mozart 255, Karajan Centenary , Bernstein Centenary , Brendel Retirement etc… 200 Hyperlinks do not give much of a hint as to content
Add to that the fact that the “nearest competitor” allows for individual artwork, individual album naming etc within a box set and that leaves Roon at a severe disadvantage from a classical view point.
The other major issue is the accuracy of the metadata for many classical albums. Since this is bought in I suspect there is little to be done. When I first loaded my library probably half of my classical albums failed in one way or another (Identification, splitting compositions etc). There are ways around it by reverting to a third part editor , correcting the Work/Part pairing and then Preferring File rather than the Roon data. One of the big selling points of Roon to me is the “Totally Auto” nature of recognition, this sort of defeats the object a bit
I could go on , and probably will sometime in the future, There are many areas where classical stuff gets the poor relation treatment
The simple question is can we as classical users expect to see any change in the foreseeable future or do we simply have to put up and shut up.
Needless to say my annual renewal is coming due sometime soon , so I need a little reassurance.
Mike