Ok, this example has mostly sold me on the need to do something here.
We designed some really cool behavior for the Appearances section of artist details a while back, before launch. I can’t remember the exact artist, but I owned their solo albums, as well as albums from a group they had been a part of, and a bunch of other random albums they had appeared on.
The artist was best known for their work with the group, but all the famous work they did together was lumped in with the grab bag of other appearances, and was IMO insufficiently prominent on this artists page. So, we built some logic that said if enough of the appearances were with the same group, we’d split it to its own row.
So now, if you have two Miles Davis albums on which Coltrane played, you’ll see them under appearances. If you have a many albums on which they collaborated, you’re likely to get a “With Miles Davis” row on Coltrane’s page!
I’m wondering if a similar solution would be good here. If I own 2 Grateful Dead albums, and one is a bootleg, I’m not sure I want two rows, with 1 album a piece. Alternatively, if I had 400 bootlegs, I could definitely see myself wanting those split them off from their studio albums.
What do you guys think? I’d love to avoid the clutter and potential confusion that could be caused by forcing this distinction on people who only have a handful of recordings by a given artist. I’d also love to avoid making this a setting, since there will inevitably be people who would prefer it one way or the other, but simply don’t know about the setting.
I think if we can make this smart, everyone will be happy… And then we can talk about what to do if an album is both a live album AND a bootleg