Suggested hardware

I have the same setup I5 NUC 2 x 8gb RAM, 120gb M.2 SSD, local 1tb internal drive + Synology NAS with 5k albums and it is very quick, no issues at all.

2 Likes

I got the bigger NUC, put in a M.2 drive for the OS, and added a 2TB SSD for the music. 1TB is enough for your library, and mine, just wanted some growth room. The SSD is more expensive ($700+) but I like having no spinning disks in there. Quieter.

Hi Anders can you please tell me if you leave Roon open in the background and keep your nuc open all the time does it go to sleep and can you wake Roon from your iPad or android device? Thank you very much.

9 posts were split to a new topic: Windows startup (system service?)

I’m planning on adding Roon’s Linux Server to a mini-itx board running an i3-4330 CPU @ 3.50GHz with 16GB RAM. The CPU is dual core, 2 threads per core. Am I likely to experience a significant improvement if I switched to a (quad core) i5 processor?

On all the time. Idle it uses 47 W (measured). Headless (i.e. no monitor), boots with Roonserver on.

Dedicated to Room, used for nothing else.
I wanted it very simple, behaving like a 1970s FM radio, no requirement to keep the network up or a NAS functional; I have those things but they are not involved in music enjoyment. I wrote up how I configured it here.

Great to hear, thank you.

Am I likely to experience a significant improvement if I switched to a (quad core) i5 processor?

With your collection size, yes.

1 Like

[quote=“danny, post:111, topic:90”]
@evand: Can I ask why you can’t run as your admin account on your 2012 server?
[/quote]@danny, I tried that but Win spat the dummy having Roon run as Administrator account. Not a biggie as I’ll switch to Linux the second you release the server. In the interim it’d just be convenient being able to remove the video card from the Win server box and having Roon fire up without having to login.

Correction.

47 W sounded too high for the NUC at idle, so I checked.
I use a PSAudio P10 because my house power is very poor. It shows the consumption. But I had forgotten to turn off the Meridian speakers, they contain four DACs and five amps each.

The NUC alone draws 20 W when idle. Like a night light.

NUC, Meridian 818 and DSP8000s and Geek Pulse together draw 90 W at idle.

2 Likes

hi
another question if you dont mind giving me some more advice on,are laptops ok for running the core on if so which make or models and specs should i be looking at,ive been having some thoughts on going the laptop with wd duo harddrive connected for storage,my budget would be £500 for a new or a used one,

thank you
gary

Very Good Write Up. I’m New to Roon, just downloaded trial version. FYI will not make my move until i have my hardware set up completed (and some $$ in my pocket to make move to Roon :smiley:). First Day experience of Roon, one word? = Fantastic!

Suggestion: Why dont Roon come up with dedicated hardware with 16GB+ Ram, Good i7 with good cache, and of course integrated graphics, but can remove many extras on the NUC (example USB, additional DP, Additional on-board chips etc) , basically reduce BOM and bare enough and dedicated for Audio only like platform? so the overall cost reduces but excellent future looking maybe 4-5 years. Roon Can Package it in one box solution ?. I m sure someone has already suggested and some discussion has already happened :). Realizing now after typing all above :stuck_out_tongue:

1 Like

Actually, they did that in the past. It was the original Sooloos product. It was eventually acquired by Meridian. Meridian spun off the Sooloos guys because they “didn’t want to be a software company”. This has allowed Roon (previously Sooloos) to focus on the software. Roon’s goal, if I may be so presumptuous, is to be the interface of the Highend and not be tied to any specific hardware. As you might see that focus has many advantages.

1 Like

We definitely don’t really to do audio gear, and controls are better provided by tablet manufacturers and all in one PC manufacturers. That leaves the core, and we have many partners ready to do those.

All Makes sense!.

Especially the nMVE version. Wicked Fast.

This is my favorite page to read for suggested hardware.

Question is : Here you it is written “Plenty of Ram” - what was RAM size in your mind when this was written?

Because you say it here that 8GB is sufficient for “anyone”

Eventually - i m planning for NUC but i have flexibility of 8GB or 16GB. (i m picky on single 16GB chip Vs 4x4 or 8x2 etc, I would go with single chip, sorry deviating)

Gary - I’m not yet on NUC. But I did costing on NUC today.
NUC-i5 6th gen + 16gb + 1tb should fit within $600 or less.
Previous gen i7 should also fit well within $600

Currently RoonServer is on MacBook-Air

1 Like

Where RAM is concerned in general you’re better off doing dual channel rather than single chip.

I’m running a library akin in size to that @brian refers to above on an i3 mini-itx with 16gb ram and a 60GB SSD for Roon’s database. Performance is acceptable using an iPhone 6, iPad Pro and Samsung Galaxy View as remotes. I’m going to switch to an i7 CPU in due course, but as you can see 16GB RAM is way more than RoonServer needs

With analysis underway here’s the RAM consumption running RoonServer on Linux:

PID USER PR NI VIRT RES %CPU %MEM TIME+ S COMMAND 669 root 20 0 13.3m 3.0m 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 S `- start.sh 688 root 20 0 531.0m 34.3m 0.0 0.2 0:00.89 S `- RoonServer 724 root 20 0 5117.8m 1.783g 94.7 11.5 351:02.48 S `- RoonAppliance 753 root 20 0 810.4m 34.2m 0.0 0.2 0:02.90 S `- RAATServer 727 root 20 0 7.0m 0.9m 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 S `- processreaper

1 Like

I stand by that. 8gb is plenty, especially for a dedicated or mostly dedicated machine.

A year later, it’s become clear to us that the most important factor in Roon’s performance is the SSD that holds the database, followed by the performance of a single core of the CPU.

1 Like