I took up the offer for Tidal for 12 days. My first foray into Tidal
Interesting for me Tidal on most album tracks (flac 44.1) sounds better against the corresponding same album tracks ripped on my hard drive (the rips are done on my Imac using XLD, accurateRip). Sure my rips are not the same since I don’t have the same source file (a CD in my case) but nevertheless Tidal sounds better (more relaxing).
The Tidal tracks have a quieter background and more separation between the instruments especially in terms of depth and better timing. It’s not massive though. It seems my ripped music has more bass but not as tight and controlled and the music in general is slightly muddled (this is what I mean by timing) compared to Tidal.
My system: Modem/Router -> cat 6a -> Nuc i3 (with SBooster 19V+ 750GB Western Digital Red HHD, ROCK) -> Ghent Audio Lan cable -> SOtM SMS 200 --> Singxer F1 usb to spdif --> Dac -> etc …
Btw, I’m using Roon for local Nuc i3 internal HDD music and Tidal streaming. Note also I’ve bridged the Lan ports (or correctly separate sub-nets) on the Nuc i3.
Question: When streaming from Tidal, I presume Roon doesn’t use the internal HDD in the Nuc i3, is that correct?
Question: If so, I was a curious when playing from the internal Nuc i3 HDD drive if the next track is read from the HDD drive all at once and buffered in the SSD m2 drive or continually read from the HDD?
I ask since I’m wondering if the internal HDD drive of the Nuc i3 could be replaced by a SSD drive for a better sound, closer to the Tidal tracks? My internal Nuc i3 HDD is quite noisy.
Alternatively, it could be that my ripped tracks with XLD using Imac are simply not good as the corresponding Tidal Flac files?
Yeah, I know there are a lot of variables here. I’m just trying to ascertain if possibly a change from HDD to SSD may make for better music.