I still request a “Folder browser mode”.
Before you just start saying “Roon is DB based” or “You will never have this mode” just make me explain why I want it.
I am aware that Roon is based upon a DATABASE of songs and tags are everything. I like it, I am happy with it, it helps me to keep my audio files ordered and neat.
Apart songs and albums I have other stuff yet.
I have multiple folders with multiple audio files that aren’t songs. They could be pieces of songs, radio rips, guitar, drum, bass tracks, interviews, and other.
All that files could be with or without tags, and are collect in folders and subfolders.
I absolutely DON’T want Roon to import them into its database, oh my God, if Roon will import those tracks into its DB it would destroy everything.
So, now open your mind a little before refuse what I am asking.
Roon is my STANDARD music player.
What’s the problem if you add a FOLDER BROWSER MODE, you click on it and a folder browse window will open give you the chance to browser into folders and subfolders that you choose.
In such occasion, Roon will act like a normal audio player (like winamp, foobar, etc.), you listen your music/audio files using it’s sound abiliets (endpoints, dps, etc.) but Roon will not collect history of it, will not collect those audio files tags data into its data base. Imagine like a “Anonymous browse window” of Chrome or Firefox to get the idea.
You quit from the “browser mode” and will back in the classical Roon interface with your albums and tracks.
In that way I will use Roon not only for my “ordinary” albums and tracks but for EVERYTHING that is audio on my storage, without mess up its database and I will have the advatage of using Roon and not other stuff.
Why we can’t have that mode?