Support wants each user to have their own support threads. I pulled the other posts out for TripleCrotchet’s posts, for his issues for his support thread.
I have now pulled your post out. Please keep your discussions here so that the separate support threads can be kept separate.
You probably want a more precise answer from support but my understanding is that it is “remote”. I have seen it mentioned in a few threads now that search has been completely migrated from local core to remote cloud. A major architectural change was announced by roon some weeks ago. Myself, personally, I have only noticed these search issues since build 1169. But it is possible they were there earlier because this has all coincided with me firing up some old NAS storage that was dormant this last 2 plus years over Covid and that has effectively doubled the size of my local library.
This is not making any sense. The mods were asked to split one thread into two and you have closed one of them. It makes mores sense that the thread was not split in the first place so that information is not lost.
I am not sure I understand this comment from the other thread. Are you saying that single word queries must be enabled on a case by case basis, that more generally it is not allowed to search (say) by composer last name? Or do I misunderstand?
No, that’s not what I’m saying. Just that these particular cases are not support cases. You can expect for chopin, brahms, bach to see the composer, but the probability is lower with less popular composers, in particular in cases like beach where there are also significant non-classical matches.
Why is popularity a determinant for basic search functionality? @brian ’s recent post explains a bit about the nuances of making universal search decisions, but for local libraries with perhaps an unusually diverse range composers, the decision to not allow unpopular single search terms is tough. What if I don’t remember which “Praetorius”? (There are a family of them, like the Bach family.)
I’d love a dialogue on how I would locate a desired album in the new Roon search world.
Curiously, I tried some composers where only one name is known (Perotin or Perotinus), and Roon had no problem finding the correct composer, and quickly led me to the albums in my library:
But the painting representing Perotin is pretty funny. It looks to be Lassus, from a few centuries later, but maybe I am wrong about that; I tried to use Valence to correct it, but it doesn’t work on an iPad, and then I tried again on a laptop but now get 503 errors. EDIT: Reloaded, and just got in.
I’d probably suggest a snippet from Pluteo 29.1 of one of the 4 part organa instead of a traditional "portrait:, if the mods deemed that substitute acceptable.
It’s a general error that indicates that the core either had an issue sending a request to the cloud, or that the cloud is not responding in a timely manner.
The issue right now is that you’re getting an error for some search queries on the search page (like praetorius), it has absolutely nothing to do with composers. Very likely, you’d be able to reproduce the issue with some album titles as well. This wasn’t a decision, it’s a bug, and its fix is being tested by our QA team.
I am finding that whereas typing the entire second name fails, typing just the first few letters can succeed. This does not work in every case and it is not at all clear how many letters are necessary. For example: