As more and more people only use Roon for streaming, and now with the competition from Tidal Connect, wouldn’t it be beneficial for you to provide a stream only subscription on a slightly lover price point?
What is the issue with the price, Roon is cheap enough for what it delivers in my opinion. I spend more (much more) on Fish N Chips annually without a thought. I would expect the development cost would be the same for this option, if not more because of running two systems.
Just my thought on the issue.
3 Likes
As most users, according to roon, are streaming only already there doesn’t seem to be much incentive to change.
1 Like
Alright, I wasn’t aware that most users were only using Roon for streaming. Thanks for that info.
Is that actually correct? If it is, it is quite surprising.
I think Danny wrote in a thread that most subscribers are stream only with a tablet and a core.
I’m very surprised. But it is simple and it was how I started though I have since evolved into a more sophisticated Roon user!
Actually I must correct myself. The vast majority have a streaming service but local is also owned by the majority.
1 Like
I agree with this sentiment. User base and features should not be split into tiers of subscription.
1 Like
Consider yourself corrected! 
1 Like