I have and absolutely love my TT2, which is fed via BNC from my Lumin U1 Mini. So of course it’s time to start obsessing over whether an M Scaler can possibly be worth the additional investment.
Understanding that there’s no substitute for buying the thing and seeing (or hearing), here’s a point of comparison that might or might not be relevant. I have been playing with Roon-based DSD upsampling (max at 192), and while there’s a SLIGHT difference I can detect (a scoche more presence), it’s really slight to my ears.
Is that any indication of what I’d have in store with the M Scaler? Or are we talking a whole different and discernible experience?
Most of what I’ve read from all of you and reviews says the answer is “yes,” the M Scaler is a significant difference-maker, but wondering if my Roon experience is suggesting the difference for me might be something less significant.
Isn’t it great with forum based advice and support?
My experience with the M-Scaler is that it does make a difference, but it is nowhere near being cost efficient if you are reasonably sane. Yes, it does provide better spacial cues, and smoother conversion. But these differences are miniscule compared to relocating your speakers one inch, in my (not so) humble opinion.
You want to try this at a lower cost? Loose the BNC-connection, use USB and feed your TT2 752.8/768Khz PCM from a HQ Player hardware instead. You’ll come close to what the Scaler does, at a fraction of the cost. There are plenty of threads over at the sanatorium, eh, i mean Audiophile Style forums…
After an exhausting dive into the discussions, I’ve ordered the M-Scaler, convinced that the best and only way to evaluate is to buy and try. I vascillate between excitement and a sense that I’m pouring a lot of money into a small incremental improvement. This is the least secure I’ve felt about any gear purchase, but my dealer has a generous 60-day return period. We will see……