Always Requires Connection …
(that is, your core does with 2.0 )
Some are not amused at all …
Guess that just means looking for an alternative to Roon 2.0 on my Mac (1.8 legacy?) when in a remote cottage for 2 weeks. Not a massive issue for me, but a bit surprised by this decision and the arguments put forward in favour by Roon.
naming things is hard and Active Room Correction is not really known. ARC and eARC for HDMI is probably better known, and even then its a weird esoteric feature of a cable. I don’t think there is any confusion possibilities.
Roon stated in another post that it isn’t an acronym, but without any further explanation of what it means.
When I was invited as a beta tester, I thought ARC was something completely different (there was no explanation of what it was in the invitation). I wasn’t the only one that thought it was something different (room correction).
I wondered if ARC might have been an internal codename that made the leap to an actual feature name. Internal codenames can sometimes have a huge impact on how software engineering and marketing teams think about and conceptualize a feature.
I think if they’d styled it Roon Arc instead of Roon ARC we’d likely be having a very different conversation.
New features usually have internal code names, but - usually - they are given “real” names when shipped. They could have asked for name suggestions before making it public, but I guess they didn’t want to end up with Roony McRoonface.
If some of the projects I worked on shipped with their codenames they’d be named after chemical elements, WWII aircraft, and large lakes. All in all, a good thing they didn’t, I think.
My favorite codenames were Ren and Stimpy for two companions projects.