Ok, I’m not a classical listener and know little of the genre, but that doesn’t meant I don’t or won’t listen, but just looking through covers they convey such a dull and uninviting aspect to me.
There are exceptions, so it can be done and maybe these covers appeal to aficionados but…
It is a link back to the classic(al) DGG LP covers with their distinctive yellow emblems.
I don’t really care. Back in the last century, when we browsed through bins of physical discs, the cover was important because it served to grab one’s attention with surprise or familiarity. These days, with almost infinite content on tap, text and tag searches make cover art less than window dressing. If you don’t like it, replace it.
Horses for course come into play whatever one does, but miserable faces on dull covers is just so unimaginative in my view.
Maybe that is just the image they wish to project or maybe it’s just the way it’s always been done and style is frowned upon as being popular and not elitist enough… I don’t know?
That’s all very well and good. I am looking from the outside and this is the impression that could well be widely held.
If that’s not important to the producers, that’s ok, it is what it is and a least I know now.
@Chrislayeruk - maybe you’re looking at the wrong albums.
I only own a few DG records and most just have a small yellow DG logo on the front cover, but here’s one from 1989 with the larger version and it looks quite OK, I’d say: