Hey, no need to apologise. You are 100% within your rights to report this rubbish which we (directly) and you (indirectly) pay for. I was just trying to stop the new issues getting lost (I should have just broken them out into a new thread straightaway).
We have lots to do in 2024 data-wise, and much of it will be non-visible, but I’d already planned to take another look at our metadata source preferences next year (and the consequences of throwing away credits from one metadata source when we have “enough” from a potentially more reliable metadata source).
The simple truths are that (a) metadata sources which are globally comprehensive, accurate, and usable just don’t exist, and (b) Roon is rather good at exposing these inadequacies. 