“A fool and his money are soon parted.”
Very clear. Money in the pocket of certain sellers.
Is this crystal optimization done by a virgin in a cave with 150 year old scottish air, while a unicorn is supervising?
Money talks it’s not a lie…I heard it once - it said goodbye
Whatever you buy it says goodbye.
Good friend of mine told me he would never invest more than 100$ declaring his belonging to so called group of “Ropieee Happy people” (This reminded me on “Shiny Happy People” by R.E.M)
Im a “Ropieee happy people” too…there are 2 more that I missed powering up…12 in all in the house but not all active normally about 6 active all the time and 2 of the LCD ones are display for DACs in those zones
“boodwah”
I live by the sea. Please leave the gulls out of it!
Unfortunately the marketing details or not very clear on those important points.
For those that think switches make a difference, please read the following post concerning how RAAT works. RAAT and clock ownership
Becomes more and more interesting with more and more competitors…
https://hifipig.com/russ-andrews-launches-the-network-switch/#more-62041
The article starts off with a bang. Doesn’t make it two sentences without the first lie.
Timing is irrelevant at the Ethernet layer.
Not bang for the buck, though.
Remind me, what’s that thing again that happens every minute?
Could you please explain it to the network/ethernet illiterates?
Your DAC endpoint buffers the signal and control the timing. The timing in the network is irrelevant
I see, so it does not impact the SQ, let’s say if the frame #2 arrives at the DAC after 2 secs from frame #1, frame #3 5 secs, frame #4 0.5 secs and so on?
The buffer and network take care of that. If you had problems you would hear drop outs.
I’ve moved a number of posts to a new topic in the #support category where the problem can be better dealt with and this thread can return to the original topic.