I suspect even if I could get it to find mount.cifs it would still fail since I don’t run Roon as root, but as a non-privileged user (for obvious reasons)
What, you don’t run an unsecured and unauthenticated .NET application as root? That is crazy talk. All joking aside, this is exactly why I run it in a docker container with read-only access to data.
Right, it also strikes me as a remarkably poor choice.
Moreover, it also tries to mount the share to /mnt which, for example, doesn’t even exist in my system! Why wouldn’t they just make a user mount in $ROON_DATAROOT?
Bernard,
I just posted a similar problem. I have a Deja Vu + Mystique Basic. I spoke with Benjamin this morning & he said that 1 of his other customers was having similar issues. Is that you & has it been fixed yet & how.
That makes this extra odd as it would mean Roon is completely broken on Linux, which doesn’t seem to be the case as there would be a lot more error reports/complaints if it were.
I really wish someone in the Roon team would come here and acknowledge this issue and give us some kind of roadmap/ETA for the fix.
Absolutely, this lack of response just sucks. With no way to downgrade, I’m effectively sitting on thousands of dollars worth of bricks scattered through my house. I mean, I guess I can use TIDAL and Qobuz, but I’d prefer to play from my local library and have my playlists actually work.
I’ve no problems with giving them room to fix it, but this should have never showed up in a major release. ZFS root on Linux has had major pushes into the consumer base over the past few years, especially so with the Ubuntu releases. I’m not directly blaming the developers because bugs do happen, but I do have problems with the poor QA that leads to a showstopper bug like this showing up in a release.
I’d call it a one off, but the vast majority of the major bugs that came with 1.8 could have been easily caught with proper testing. If you’re going to support a platform, you absolutely need to be doing the basic tests with every major distribution and probable configuration. It takes time and effort, but it reduces the lost of revenue from cancelled subscriptions.
Instead they have a portion of their paying user base stuck without the software/service for which they’ve payed, and for an extended period of time. If this were a free software/service, I’d rage a bit then shrug. But this is not an overly cheap piece of software to run, especially so for those of us who put out the chunk of change for the lifetime.
But yes, there is not much we can do other thank sit back and wait.
p.s. I come from industries where five nines uptime is the way of life, so my rage gronks are related to personal and business ideals.
I discussed this issue with QA today and the investigation is still in progress, I don’t have any specific updates I can share at this time but thank you in advance for your patience while we look into this issue further.